石咏: Handling ecosystem service trade‑offs: the importance of the spatial scale at which no‑loss constraints are posed.

发布人:陈永佳 发布时间:2024-04-29 点击次数:

石咏Handling ecosystem service trade‑offs: the importance of the spatial scale at which no‑loss constraints are posed.

我校皇冠hg1088官方官网石咏老师在T2级别期刊——《Landscape Ecology》上发表题为“Handling ecosystem service trade‑offs: the importance of the spatial scale at which no‑loss constraints are posed”。论文第一作者石咏为皇冠hg1088官方官网教授。

Abstract /摘要

Context Managing land use to promote an ecosystem service (ES) without reducing others is challenging. The spatial scale at which no-loss constraints are imposed is relevant.

Objectives We examined the influence of the spatial scale of no-loss constraints on ESs when one ES was optimised. Specifically, we investigated how carbon sequestration could be maximized at different spatial scales in France with constraints of no-loss on other ESs.

Methods We used a statistical model linking land use and land cover variables to ESs [carbon sequestration (CS), crop production (CP), livestock production, timber growth] in French small agricultural regions (SARs). We optimised CS at the country scale posing no-loss constraints on other ESs at increasing spatial scales, i.e., SARs (scenario 'SARs'), department ('DEP'), administrative region ('REG'), and France ("FRANCE"). We analysed differences between optimized and initial configurations.

Results Optimized CS at the country scale increased with the spatial scale at which no-loss constraints were posed (similar to+ 0.51% for 'DEP' and similar to+ 2.05% for 'FRANCE'). The variability of ES variation among the SARs similarly increased. This suggested that constraints at larger scales lead to ES segregation. Correlations among ES variations changed with the scenarios (Spearman's rho between CS and CP was - 0.43 for 'DEP' and - 0.70 for 'FRANCE'). This indicated that different land use strategies produce different degrees of enhancement/softening of ES trade-offs/synergies.

Conclusions A trade-off was highlighted: larger spatial scales promoted better performance of the target ES but also spatial inequality. We argue that addressing smaller scales will lead to land-sharing solutions that avoid the local environmental impacts of land-sparing strategies.

论文信息;

Title/题目:

Handling ecosystem service trade-offs: the importance of the spatial scale at which no-loss constraints are posed

Authors/作者:

Shi, Yong; Tonda, Alberto; Accatino, Francesco

Keywords /关键词

Ecosystem services trade-offsOptimizationStrong sustainabilityMulti-scale analysisLand use strategy

DOI:10.1007/s10980-023-01635-9

全文链接:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-023-01635-9

Baidu
sogou